Most young earth creationists reject all of these points.
As a scientific skeptics, we ask ourselves: is this really the case?
Hence, all these parameters must be assumed—always.
There is no other way.”[i] Naturalists still make assumptions even if they try to say that they don’t have to know initial conditions.
Creationists do admit that radioactive decay has occurred, but “it is important to understand the simple, fundamental principle behind all dating methods, and why they are not able to produce objective, absolute dates…The fatal flaw is that all scientific measurements are made in the present, whereas a date relates to a time in the past.
We cannot go back into the past to measure all the parameters we need in order to do the dating calculation.
If any of these assumptions are wrong, then the reliability of the testing method can and should be put in question.Obviously both sides of this debate have agendas to promote, and that means that any summary you're likely to read was probably motivated by one agenda or the other.Let's begin with a basic understanding of the radiometric dating technique used, K-Ar, or potassium-argon.The three main assumptions that affect the results of radiometric dating are: 1) the rate of decay has always been constant, 2) there has been no contamination (no movement of elements into or out of the object over time), and 3) we can determine how much daughter element there was to begin with.[ii] There are many test results that make the reliability of these dating techniques very questionable.[iii] Naturalists try to explain these questionable results, but still can’t adequately explain them from their worldview.[iv] Evidence from “as far back as 1971” may show “that high pressure could increase decay rates very slightly for at least 14 isotopes.”[v] Naturalists even admit that radiocarbon dating does not work on living mussels because of the lack of new carbon in that environment.So what other situations and conditions create unreliable results that we must also throw out the dating because of?Most people, even the experts in the field, forget the assumptions on which radiometric dating is based.